The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early theorists like Ellsworth Huntington argued that climate was the primary driver of civilizational development, suggesting that temperate zones fostered innovation while tropical regions lagged. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its ethnocentric biases and oversimplification of complex human-environment interactions. Modern scholarship emphasizes 'possibilism', which posits that while the environment sets constraints, human agency and cultural adaptation play pivotal roles in shaping societal outcomes. This shift reflects a broader trend in social sciences toward recognizing the dialectical relationship between nature and culture, where neither is wholly dominant. Understanding this evolution is crucial for contemporary environmental policy, as it warns against deterministic models that may justify inequality or neglect local knowledge.
❓ この文章で言及されている環境決定論に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. それは人間の主体性の役割を過度に強調している。
B. それは、気候が社会に与える影響を無視している。
C. それは民族中心主義的であり、人間と環境の相互作用を過度に単純化している。
D. それは技術革新の重要性を考慮していない。
✅ 正确答案
It is ethnocentric and oversimplifies human-environment interactions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first