The concept of 'green infrastructure' has gained significant traction in urban planning as a means to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change. Unlike traditional gray infrastructure, which relies on concrete and steel to manage stormwater, green infrastructure employs natural systems such as permeable pavements, green roofs, and urban forests. These features not only reduce flooding by absorbing rainfall but also improve air quality and provide recreational spaces. However, the implementation of green infrastructure is not without challenges. High upfront costs, maintenance requirements, and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration often hinder its adoption. Moreover, its benefits are not evenly distributed, with wealthier neighborhoods more likely to receive such investments, exacerbating environmental inequality. Despite these obstacles, proponents argue that long-term savings in healthcare and energy costs, coupled with enhanced community resilience, justify the initial expenditure. Thus, policymakers must carefully weigh the trade-offs to ensure equitable and sustainable urban development.