The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal recognition as a new geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. These markers, they contend, justify a distinct epoch following the Holocene. However, skeptics within the geological community question whether the Anthropocene meets the strict criteria for an epoch, which typically require a clear, globally synchronous boundary in rock strata. They also warn that formalizing the Anthropocene could oversimplify the complex, diachronous nature of human impacts across different regions, potentially undermining the precision of geological time scales. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the broader societal implications of acknowledging humanity's profound influence on Earth's systems.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 일부 지질학자들이 인류세를 새로운 지층 시대(epoch)로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향 표지는 자연적 과정과 충분히 구별되지 않는다.
B. B. 제안된 경계는 전 지구적으로 동시적이지 않을 수 있으며, 지역적 차이를 지나치게 단순화할 위험이 있다.
C. C. 방사성 동위원소와 미세플라스틱은 너무 최근의 것이어서 지질학적 지표로 간주될 수 없다.
D. D. 이 개념은 지질학계 밖에서 너무 많은 주목을 받아 왔다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed boundary may not be globally synchronous and could oversimplify regional variations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first