The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that human activities and societal development were largely dictated by climatic conditions and geographical features. However, this view was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for justifying colonial expansion. Modern scholarship emphasizes a more nuanced approach, recognizing that while the environment sets certain constraints, human agency, technological innovation, and cultural values play pivotal roles in shaping outcomes. For instance, societies in similar climatic zones have developed vastly different economic systems, indicating that environmental factors are not sole determinants. This shift reflects a broader trend in social sciences toward acknowledging the interplay of multiple variables rather than relying on single-cause explanations.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 결정론이 비판을 받은 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 기술 발전을 완전히 무시했다.
B. B. 그것은 단순화된 설명을 제공했고 식민지 행위를 지지했다.
C. C. 그것은 기후보다는 문화적 가치에만 초점을 맞추었다.
D. D. 그것은 오래된 지리 데이터에 기반한 것이었다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It provided a simplistic explanation and supported colonial actions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first