The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as globalization intensifies cross-cultural interactions. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on personal emotions, CQ specifically measures an individual's capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers identify four distinct components: metacognitive CQ (awareness of cultural assumptions), cognitive CQ (knowledge of cultural norms), motivational CQ (interest in adapting), and behavioral CQ (ability to modify verbal and non-verbal actions). Studies suggest that high CQ predicts better performance in multinational teams, particularly when tasks require negotiation or conflict resolution. However, critics argue that CQ frameworks often oversimplify culture, treating it as static rather than dynamic, and may overlook power imbalances inherent in cross-cultural encounters. Despite these limitations, CQ training programs have been widely adopted by corporations seeking to enhance global leadership competencies.
❓ この文章によると、文化的知性フレームワークに対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. A. それは感情調整を過度に重視している。
B. B. それは文化が不変であると想定し、権力の力学を無視している。
C. C. これは交渉タスクにのみ適用可能です。
D. D. それは企業研修において実用的な応用がありません。
✅ 正确答案
B. It assumes culture is unchanging and ignores power dynamics.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first