The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike previous epochs, which were shaped by natural forces such as volcanic activity or orbital variations, the Anthropocene is marked by distinctive stratigraphic signatures, including radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Some scholars argue that the term oversimplifies the complex, heterogeneous nature of human-environment interactions, while others contend that it serves as a powerful catalyst for interdisciplinary research and public awareness. The debate underscores broader questions about how scientific classifications reflect cultural and political values, and whether naming a new epoch might inadvertently reinforce a narrative of inevitable environmental degradation rather than encouraging proactive stewardship.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세의 공식적 인정이 논쟁이 되는 핵심 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 어떤 독특한 지질학적 표지도 결여하고 있다.
B. B) 어떤 이들은 그것이 인간과 환경의 상호작용을 부정확하게 단순화한다고 믿는다.
C. C) 그것은 오직 비과학자들에 의해서만 제안되어 왔다.
D. D) 그것은 자연적 힘의 역할을 완전히 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) Some believe it inaccurately simplifies human-environment interactions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first