The concept of 'environmental determinism,' which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been a subject of intense debate among geographers. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and innovation, while tropical regions were associated with lethargy and stagnation. However, modern scholarship has largely rejected this deterministic framework, emphasizing instead the role of human agency, technological adaptation, and cultural values. Critics point out that environmental determinism oversimplifies complex interactions and has historically been used to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies. Contemporary research adopts a more nuanced 'possibilist' approach, suggesting that the environment offers a range of possibilities, which societies exploit differently based on their social structures and historical contexts. This shift reflects a broader intellectual movement toward understanding human-environment relationships as dynamic and reciprocal rather than unidirectional.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 현대 학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 엘스워스 헌팅턴과 같은 논란의 여지가 있는 인물들에 의해 제안되었다.
B. B. 그것은 인간의 주체적 역할을 무시하고 인간-환경 상호작용을 지나치게 단순화한다.
C. C. 그것은 열대 지역에만 적용되며 온대 기후에는 적용되지 않는다.
D. D. 최근 기술 발전으로 인해 이는 틀렸음이 입증되었습니다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It ignores the role of human agency and oversimplifies human-environment interactions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first