The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that climate and topography directly shape human behavior, leading to cultural differences. However, modern scholars reject this simplistic causality, noting that technological advancements and globalization have diminished the influence of physical environment. Instead, they propose 'possibilism', which suggests that environment offers opportunities but human agency determines outcomes. A recent study in arid regions demonstrated that communities with similar ecological constraints developed divergent social structures due to historical trade routes and political systems. This illustrates that while environmental factors are significant, they are not deterministic. Understanding this interplay is crucial for policy-making, particularly in addressing climate change impacts on vulnerable societies, as overemphasizing environmental influence could lead to fatalistic responses rather than adaptive strategies.
❓ Согласно тексту, в чём заключается основная критика экологического детерминизма современными учёными?
A. Оно игнорирует роль климата в формировании культур.
B. Он не учитывает человеческую деятельность и технологические факторы.
C. Это преувеличивает влияние торговых путей на социальные структуры.
D. Ему не хватает эмпирических данных из засушливых регионов.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for human agency and technological factors.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first