The concept of 'environmental determinism,' which posits that human behavior and societal development are primarily shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been largely discredited in modern geography. Critics argue that it oversimplifies the complex interplay between culture, technology, and agency. However, a nuanced revival, termed 'neo-environmentalism,' acknowledges that environmental factors can exert significant constraints, particularly in pre-industrial societies. For instance, the availability of domesticable plants and animals influenced the timing of agricultural revolutions, which in turn affected population density and the emergence of complex political structures. Yet, this perspective stops short of claiming inevitability, recognizing that human innovation and historical contingency often mediate environmental pressures. Thus, while the physical environment sets certain parameters, it does not dictate the trajectory of human societies.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 전통적 환경 결정론과 신환경주의의 주요 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 신환경주의는 환경이 인간 사회에 미치는 어떠한 영향도 완전히 거부한다.
B. 신환경주의는 환경적 제약을 인식하면서도 인간의 행위성과 역사적 우연성을 허용한다.
C. 신환경결정론은 산업화 이전 사회에만 초점을 맞추는 반면, 전통적 결정론은 모든 시대에 적용된다.
D. 신환경주의는 환경적 요인이 사회 발전의 유일한 결정 요인이라고 주장한다.
✅ 正确答案
Neo-environmentalism recognizes environmental constraints but allows for human agency and historical contingency.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first